Pages

09 August 2010

Levičarsko odrastanje

Na letovanju sam, pored Autostoperskog vodiča za galaksiju, čitao i Hitch-22, autobiografiju Christophera Hitchensa. Još je nisam završio, a prilično je zanimljiva.

Elem, Hitchens je studirao na Oksfordu krajem 60-ih, kada je dosta učestvovao u organizovanju raznoraznih levičarskih aktivnosti, kojih je tada tamo dosta bilo. Evo jednog zanimljivog dela, sa 104. strane:

We didn’t grow our hair too long, because we wanted to mingle with the workers at the factory gate and on the housing estates. We didn’t “do” drugs, which we regarded as a pathetic, weak-minded escapism almost as contemptible as religion (as well as a bad habit which could expose us to a “plant” from the police). Rock and roll and sex were OK. Looking back, I still think we picked the right options. The general atmosphere of intellectual promiscuity and “Third World”romanticism didn’t grab us all that hard, either. If there were any two pseudo-intellectuals who really defined moral silliness in that period, they were Herbert Marcuse and R.D. Laing. The first had come up with the lazy concept of “repressive tolerance” to explain how liberalism was just another mask for tyranny, and the second was a would-be shrink who believed schizophrenia to be, rather than a nightmarish yet treatable malady, a social “construct” imposed by the ideology of the family. It so happened that the best critiques of both these frauds (as well as a stringent essay against the marijuana “culture” titled “Flowers of Decay”) had been written for the annual Socialist Register by my new comrade Peter Sedgwick, who was a qualified expert in mental health as well as in the difference between frantic Frankfurtian illusion and stubborn material reality. So how lucky I was to have been initiated, if that’s the word I want, by someone who was a trained and hardened skeptic about the worst of the Left as well as an advocate for the best of it.

A ovde možete pročitati Hitchensov intervju za Reason iz 2001. godine, u kojem govori kako su na njega uticale libertarijanske ideje da prestane da bude socijalista. Između ostalog, u tekstu govori o ideji moguće "simbioze" levičara i libertarijanaca, makar po pitanju Rata protiv droge. Jedan zanimljiv citat sa kraja intervjua:

Marx’s original insight about capitalism was that it was the most revolutionary and creative force ever to appear in human history. And though it brought with it enormous attendant dangers, [the revolutionary nature] was the first thing to recognize about it. That is actually what the Manifesto is all about. As far as I know, no better summary of the beauty of capital has ever been written. You sort of know it’s true, and yet it can’t be, because it doesn’t compute in the way we’re taught to think. Any more than it computes, for example, that Marx and Engels thought that America was the great country of freedom and revolution and Russia was the great country of tyranny and backwardness.

4 comments:

Igor said...

Marko:
Hitch-22 je sjajna knjiga. Kada sam procitao taj deo sto ti citiras setio sam se Ivanovog teksta "Markuze i cajanka u beloj kuci". Steta sto autor umire od karcinoma...

Btw, Hitch-hiker's guide je odlican companion za poneti na letovanje. Kada sam je poneo u Grcku prvi put nisam ni usao u more dok nisam procitao svih pet nastavaka.

BluesRocker said...

I ja sam ovog leta pročitao autostoperski vodič na moru. :)

Garp said...

Mozete procitati i ovo:
http://www.jutarnji.hr/sebicni-junaci-koji-su-osvojili-angelinu-jolie-i-brad-pitta/874240

Ivan Jankovic said...

Hitchens zapravo nikad nije odrastao ni najmanje. Ostao je levicarski adolescent do danas, doktrinarni trockista. Nikad nije odbacio komunizam, samo je odbacio Staljina kao uzurpatora koji je izopacio divnu ideju. To je vrlo jeftin i lagan trik, cak i Hruscov je bio sposoban za njega. Stavise, on ga je izmislio.

David Horowitz (takodje bivsi levcar koji je stvarno odrastao) ima odlican biografski esej o Hitchensu. Kako Horowitz primecuje Hitchens je oduvek bio od onih koji su podrzavali komunisticke koljace kao "borce za slobodu" dok se bore protiv "reakcionarnih" vlada, a cim pobede i zauzmu vlast optuzivao ih za staljinizam i izopacenje ideje. Ako je nesto definicija intelektualne adolescencije, onda je to.

http://article.nationalreview.com/437551/second-thoughts/david-horowitz